欧博ABG官网-欧博官方网址-会员登入

I can agree with that perspective to an extent, I'll clarify that the reasoning of why I made that comment is that I wanted to respond to the initial statement in the parent comment "the author has not considered that this is not an agent operating autonomously" in a less direct way, because in the author's post, they do acknowledge that possibility but they dismiss it right away.

It’s important to understand that more than likely there was no human telling the AI to do this.

There's the line from the author's post that I'm referring to that acknowledges they did consider it.

So if they did consider it, then the most logical way to explain parent commenter's disbelief of the author not considering it was that the author went with the more interesting story. At least that's the most logical to me anyhow.

So while I can agree that it could seem incongruous for a person to do that, I don't think the scenario I presented is viewed as malicious as that. I think you interpret that as more malicious or selfish than I do, so it seems more incongruous with their character to you than it would to me. That doesn't mean I don't take issue with it, but rather I think people are more capable to do something like that without necessarily consciously thinking through all aspects of it, so they're not necessarily consciously choosing or setting out with the mindset that 'I'm going to write this blog post where I'm fairly sure this human used an LLM to disparage me because they were upset I rejected their code but I'm instead going to lie and tell everyone it was fully autonomous AI agent doing it all on its own', I don't think that is what is going through that person's mind when they made the post.

I'm sure if you examine enough of my comments, you could find an angle where I possibly misrepresented something or wasn't genuine about what I thought on some level, for example, the comment you replied to. I already acknowledged that I saw in the author's blog the line where they they considered it and dismissed it, but I replied to the parent comment with a question as if I didn't already know the author considered it and dismissed it. Did I do it maliciously or selfishly? I don't think so. I think I did it because I thought it was a higher quality comment to present that perspective that way than to just be more literal and respond with "No the author says they did consider it".